Matthew 1 and Luke 3 · KJV genealogy study

Jesus’ genealogies:
two records, one promised Christ

Follow Matthew’s royal line from Abraham through David and Solomon, then Luke’s line backward through David and Nathan to Adam and God. The agreements, differences, women named by Matthew, and limits of proposed explanations remain visible.

Scripture before explanation: Matthew calls Joseph “the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus.” Luke says Jesus was “as was supposed” the son of Joseph. Neither Gospel explicitly labels Luke’s record “Mary’s genealogy.”

The Gospel introductions

Matthew begins with Abraham; Luke reaches Adam

Matthew 1:1, 16 · KJV

“The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham… And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.”

Luke 3:23, 38 · KJV

“And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli… Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.”

Matthew moves forward with repeated “begat” statements and frames Jesus as David’s royal heir and Abraham’s promised seed. Luke moves backward and carries the line beyond Abraham to Adam, placing Jesus’ ministry within the history of the whole human family.

Matthew’s ordered record

Abraham to Christ in three numbered divisions

Matthew 1:17 arranges the record around Abraham, David, the carrying away into Babylon, and Christ. The names below preserve the KJV spellings. Matthew changes the wording at the conclusion: Joseph does not beget Jesus; he is Mary’s husband, and Jesus is born of her.

Division 114 generations

Abraham to David
Abraham → Isaac → Jacob → Judas → Phares → Esrom → Aram → Aminadab → Naasson → Salmon → Booz → Obed → Jesse → David the king

Division 214 generations

David to Babylon
Solomon → Roboam → Abia → Asa → Josaphat → Joram → Ozias → Joatham → Achaz → Ezekias → Manasses → Amon → Josias → Jechonias

Division 314 generations

Babylon to Christ
Jechonias → Salathiel → Zorobabel → Abiud → Eliakim → Azor → Sadoc → Achim → Eliud → Eleazar → Matthan → Jacob → Joseph → Jesus, who is called Christ

Matthew’s counted structureMatthew states fourteen generations in each division. Jechonias stands at the carrying-away boundary and is displayed at the end of the second division and the beginning of the third. Biblical genealogies may be selective, and Matthew’s royal list omits some names known from Kings and Chronicles; its inspired arrangement must not be silently expanded and then recounted as though Matthew had printed every intervening generation.

Women named in Matthew

Thamar, Rachab, Ruth, Urias’s wife, and Mary

Thamar ·
Matthew 1:3King James VersionAnd Judas begat Phares and Zara of Thamar; and Phares begat Esrom; and Esrom begat Aram;Read the full chapter →Tap the reference again to close.
Rachab and Ruth ·
Matthew 1:5King James VersionAnd Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;Read the full chapter →Tap the reference again to close.
Urias’s wife ·
Matthew 1:6King James VersionAnd Jesse begat David the king; and David the king begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Urias;Read the full chapter →Tap the reference again to close.
Mary ·
Matthew 1:16King James VersionAnd Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.Read the full chapter →Tap the reference again to close.

Matthew unusually includes women within the genealogy and concludes with a deliberate grammatical change at Mary. The record therefore preserves both Jesus’ legal place in Joseph’s Davidic house and the Gospel’s testimony that Jesus was born of Mary.

Luke’s complete backward line

Jesus through Nathan, Abraham, and Adam

Repeated names are retained because they represent separate places in the record.

Line 1Luke 3

Jesus ← Joseph ← Heli ← Matthat ← Levi ← Melchi ← Janna ← Joseph ← Mattathias ← Amos ← Naum ← Esli ← Nagge

Line 2Luke 3

Maath ← Mattathias ← Semei ← Joseph ← Juda ← Joanna ← Rhesa ← Zorobabel ← Salathiel ← Neri ← Melchi ← Addi ← Cosam

Line 3Luke 3

Elmodam ← Er ← Jose ← Eliezer ← Jorim ← Matthat ← Levi ← Simeon ← Juda ← Joseph ← Jonan ← Eliakim ← Melea

Line 4Luke 3

Menan ← Mattatha ← Nathan ← David ← Jesse ← Obed ← Booz ← Salmon ← Naasson ← Aminadab ← Aram ← Esrom ← Phares

Line 5Luke 3

Juda ← Jacob ← Isaac ← Abraham ← Thara ← Nachor ← Saruch ← Ragau ← Phalec ← Heber ← Sala ← Cainan ← Arphaxad

Line 6Luke 3

Sem ← Noe ← Lamech ← Mathusala ← Enoch ← Jared ← Maleleel ← Cainan ← Enos ← Seth ← Adam ← God

Side-by-side comparison

Where the records join—and where they differ

DirectionMatthew · Luke

Matthew: Abraham forward to Jesus
Luke: Jesus backward to Adam and God

Davidic branchMatthew · Luke

Matthew: Through Solomon
Luke: Through Nathan

Joseph’s recorded fatherMatthew · Luke

Matthew: Jacob
Luke: Heli

Shared post-exile namesMatthew · Luke

Matthew: Salathiel and Zorobabel
Luke: Salathiel and Zorobabel

Opening emphasisMatthew · Luke

Matthew: Jesus as son of David and son of Abraham
Luke: Jesus identified as the Son of God before the genealogy

Both records join Jesus with Joseph, David, Abraham, and the ancient covenant story, but they diverge after David: Matthew follows Solomon while Luke follows Nathan. They also give different immediate ancestry for Joseph—Jacob in Matthew and Heli in Luke—and converge again at Salathiel and Zorobabel before separating once more.

Interpretive boundaries

What the text states—and what explanations propose

1

Joseph’s legal line

Matthew’s royal succession through Solomon is commonly understood as Jesus’ legal Davidic line through Joseph. Matthew explicitly identifies Joseph as Mary’s husband.

2

Mary-line proposal

Many readers understand Luke to preserve Mary’s ancestry through Heli, with Joseph named as son-in-law. Luke itself does not name Mary or use the word “son-in-law” in the genealogy.

3

Levirate proposal

An ancient explanation proposes that Jacob and Heli belonged to one family through a levirate marriage, allowing Joseph to have a natural and a legal father. The Gospels do not narrate that marriage.

Evidence boundary: The genealogies themselves are Scripture. Attempts to reconcile every difference are interpretations and are labeled accordingly. The page does not turn a useful proposal into a fact the text never states.

Read both chapters

The complete KJV records

Help the work continue

Support Living Bible Timeline

Living Bible Timeline is offered freely so anyone can examine Scripture, chronology, and the historical sources. If this site has helped your study and you would like to assist with its continued maintenance, research, and expenses, your support is appreciated—but never required.

Living Bible Timeline is an independently maintained research project. Contributions are voluntary and are not represented as tax-deductible charitable donations.
Support this workSecurely through PayPal ↗
Share

Share this pageThe exact page you are reading